MENU
Filed under Opinion

Opinion | Charging for Utensils

For+many+students%2C+the+policy+which+charges+them+for+utensils+causes+inconvenience.+However%2C+the+policy+serves+to+ensure+that+the+lunch+program+may+continue+running+as+it+does.++
Back to Article
Back to Article

Opinion | Charging for Utensils

For many students, the policy which charges them for utensils causes inconvenience. However, the policy serves to ensure that the lunch program may continue running as it does.

For many students, the policy which charges them for utensils causes inconvenience. However, the policy serves to ensure that the lunch program may continue running as it does.

For many students, the policy which charges them for utensils causes inconvenience. However, the policy serves to ensure that the lunch program may continue running as it does.

For many students, the policy which charges them for utensils causes inconvenience. However, the policy serves to ensure that the lunch program may continue running as it does.

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


If you’ve ever needed a fork, whether it be because you forgot to pack one with your homemade lunch or did not grab one from the cashier at one of Great Neck’s eateries, you have most likely been exposed to the recent policy at North High— the charging of 5 cents for utensils.

The policy, implemented six to seven years ago, requires students who have not purchased food from the cafeteria to pay for their utensils instead of allowing them to freely take them. On the other hand, free utensils are provided for those who have purchased meals that warrant the use of a utensil.

For those affected, the policy had largely been enforced laxly — until recently.

The reaction to the recent stricter enforcement has been negative.  

Students complain that they have to break up bills and receive large numbers of coins back or rummage through their bags for change.

“The new utensil policy is just really a nuisance,” junior Sarah Frankel said. “A utensil is just how you eat. And who’s to say that everyone’s just going to happen to have nickels lying around?”

However inconvenient, is the policy really as terrible as we think it to be?

While we as students may see the policy as an utter outrage, it’s important to consider that its enactment was the administration’s response to our own abuse of the system in the past.

“Students were purchasing from local establishments only to return to school and use utensils,” Patricia Daley-Jimenez, director of food and nutrition services, told Guide Post in an email. “The school district general fund (revenues raised from taxpayer dollars) does not assume any cafeteria expense. Thus revenues from the sale of meals & some governmental financial assistance must be sufficient to meet the expense to operate the program.”

Yet, despite the success of the lunch program being at stake, strict enforcement of the policy has been inconsistent. As a result, students have found the efforts to enforce the policy futile.

“I just think it’s kind of pointless,” sophomore Ari Lissack said. “People can still go in and sneakily get the utensils themselves or ask their friends to get forks for them.”

Evidently, Lissack brings up a valid point. Why have the policy if it is not strictly enforced? The answer lies within the reasoning of the administration.

Cafeteria expenses create a deficit from the School Nutrition Fund such that free distribution of the utensils, when students have not purchased the school lunch, would greatly impact the operation of the program.

However strict the enforcement of the policy may be, it is being done to address past precedents of  students’ abuse of the system and help ensure that the program can continue.

About the Writer
Kirsten Law, Associate Editor

Kirsten is one of Guide Post’s associate editors. She is passionate about life sciences, drawing and creative writing. She enjoys listening to alternative...

Leave a Comment

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Left
  • Opinion | Charging for Utensils

    Feature

    New school security measures: effective or annoying?

  • Opinion | Charging for Utensils

    Opinion

    The Green New Deal: Dealing with Global Climate and Inequality

  • Opinion | Charging for Utensils

    Opinion

    iPads: Do we really need them?

  • Opinion | Charging for Utensils

    Feature

    Great Neck Problems: Middle Schoolers Lose their Moncler Hats

  • Opinion | Charging for Utensils

    Feature

    Great Neck, It’s Time to Change our Attitude Toward Undocumented Immigrants

  • Opinion | Charging for Utensils

    Opinion

    Promposals — Another way for people to “best” one another

  • Opinion | Charging for Utensils

    News

    Diverse Democratic Presidential Field Indicates American Progress

  • Opinion | Charging for Utensils

    Opinion

    Let’s Settle the Debate: Vivi’s or Mr. Wish?

  • Opinion | Charging for Utensils

    Opinion

    Gillette’s Fight Against Toxic Maculinity: Activism or Marketing?

  • Opinion | Charging for Utensils

    Opinion

    School Should Start Later

Navigate Right
The Student News Site of Great Neck North High School
Opinion | Charging for Utensils